Excalidraw vs Lucidchart: Pricing Comparison 2026
Side-by-side pricing comparison of Excalidraw and Lucidchart. See all plans, features, and costs at a glance.
Bottom line: Both Excalidraw and Lucidchart offer free plans. Excalidraw has 1 pricing tiers while Lucidchart has 4.
Last updated: March 16, 2026
Excalidraw vs Lucidchart: Quick Pricing Facts
| Feature | Excalidraw | Lucidchart |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Custom pricing | $7.95/mo |
| Number of Plans | 1 | 4 |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | open-source | per-seat |
| Annual Discount | N/A | N/A |
Excalidraw and Lucidchart are both priced at Custom pricing, making them equally accessible Design Tools. Together they offer 5 pricing plans with 25 features compared, so the best choice comes down to which features match your needs.
Both tools offer free plans, making them accessible for teams on a budget. Excalidraw uses open-source pricing while Lucidchart uses per-seat pricing, which may affect your total cost at scale.
Review the detailed tier-by-tier comparison above to see exactly which features are included at each price point and find the best fit for your Design Tools needs.
| Pricing Plans | Excalidraw Try it free | Lucidchart Try it free |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Try the forever free editor for yourself $0/monthCheapest | Free $0/monthCheapest Includes
|
| Tier 2 | — | IndividualPopular $8/monthCheapest Includes
|
| Tier 3 | — | Team $9/monthCheapest Includes
|
| Tier 4 | — | Enterprise Custom pricing Includes
|
Swipe to compare plans →
Excalidraw
Free open-source virtual whiteboard for hand-drawn style diagrams
View all Excalidraw plansLucidchart
Lucidchart offers a free plan, offers 4 tiers vs 1.
Based on pricing data only. Review the full comparison below for your specific needs.
Best value: Lucidchart
Try Lucidchart freeWhich Should You Choose?
Choose Excalidraw if:
- •You prefer Excalidraw's free tier features—features
- •You prioritize Excalidraw's user experience and interface over price (both tools are similarly priced)
- •You need predictable billing — Excalidraw's open-source model avoids surprise overages
Choose Lucidchart if:
- •You prefer Lucidchart's free tier features—3 editable documents, 60 shapes per document
- •You need 4 pricing tiers for flexible team sizing—more options mean less overpaying for features you don't need
- •You want more features built-in—Lucidchart offers 25 additional features across its plans
- •Your team needs custom enterprise pricing—Lucidchart offers negotiated terms for large deployments
Both Excalidraw and Lucidchart offer free plans [1], eliminating cost barriers for evaluation. This means you can test both tools thoroughly with your actual workflows before any financial commitment. The free tiers differ in scope: Excalidraw includes multiple features, while Lucidchart includes 5 features. Evaluate which free tier matches your evaluation needs before deciding to upgrade. Your best approach is to activate both free trials and evaluate which tool's workflow, integrations, and user experience align better with your team's needs before committing to paid plans.
Frequently Asked Questions: Excalidraw vs Lucidchart
How many pricing plans does Excalidraw have vs Lucidchart?
Does Excalidraw or Lucidchart offer a free plan?
What is the most popular Lucidchart plan?
Does Excalidraw or Lucidchart offer custom enterprise pricing?
What pricing models do Excalidraw and Lucidchart use?
How do Excalidraw and Lucidchart compare for Design Tools?
Sources
- Excalidraw Official Pricing— Vendor pricing page
- Lucidchart Official Pricing— Vendor pricing page
Related Articles
Figma vs Canva Pricing: Which Is Cheaper? (2026)
Figma ($0-$40/mo) vs Canva ($0-$300/yr) pricing comparison. Use cases, team scaling costs, features, and hidden fees analyzed.
Best Design Tools Pricing Compared (2026)
Design tool pricing: Figma ($12-60/user), Canva ($0-$300/year), Adobe CC ($20-55/user), Sketch ($12/user), Affinity ($70 one-time). Per-seat vs flat-rate models.
Track Price Changes
Get notified when pricing changes for these tools.