Agile CRM vs Clay: Pricing Comparison 2026
Side-by-side pricing comparison of Agile CRM and Clay. See all plans, features, and costs at a glance.
Bottom line: Agile CRM starts at $8.99/mo, making it $158/mo cheaper than Clay ($167/mo). Agile CRM offers a free plan.
Last updated: March 16, 2026
Agile CRM vs Clay: Quick Pricing Facts
| Feature | Agile CRM | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8.99/mo | $167/mo |
| Number of Plans | 4 | 4 |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | freemium | usage-based |
| Annual Discount | N/A | N/A |
Agile CRM is the more affordable option, starting at $8.99/mo compared to Clay's $167/mo. Both are CRM tools with 8 combined pricing plans and 49 features compared. At comparable tiers, the monthly price difference is $416.01.
Both tools offer free plans, making them accessible for teams on a budget. Agile CRM uses freemium pricing while Clay uses usage-based pricing, which may affect your total cost at scale.
Review the detailed tier-by-tier comparison above to see exactly which features are included at each price point and find the best fit for your CRM needs.
| Pricing Plans | Agile CRM Try it free | Clay Try it free |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Free $0/monthCheapest Includes
| |
| Tier 2 | Starter $9/monthCheapest $1 / year Includes
| Launch $167/month Includes
|
| Tier 3 | RegularPopular $30/monthCheapest $2 / year Includes
| GrowthPopular $446/month Includes
|
| Tier 4 | Enterprise $48/monthCheapest $4 / year Includes
| Enterprise Custom pricing Includes
|
Swipe to compare plans →
Agile CRM
Agile CRM offers a free plan, starts at $158.01/mo lower ($8.99/mo vs $167/mo).
Based on pricing data only. Review the full comparison below for your specific needs.
Best value: Agile CRM
Try Agile CRM freeWhich Should You Choose?
Choose Agile CRM if:
- •You want lower per-user costs—Agile CRM starts at $8.99/mo, saving $158.01/mo compared to Clay at $167/mo
- •You prefer Agile CRM's free tier features—For 10 users
- •You want more features built-in—Agile CRM offers 7 additional features across its plans
Choose Clay if:
- •You prefer Clay's free tier features—Unlimited seats and tables, Run multi-provider waterfalls
- •Your team needs custom enterprise pricing—Clay offers negotiated terms for large deployments
- •Clay's 4-tier usage-based structure gives clearer cost visibility for budget planning
Both Agile CRM and Clay offer free plans [1], eliminating cost barriers for evaluation. This means you can test both tools thoroughly with your actual workflows before any financial commitment. The free tiers differ in scope: Agile CRM includes 1 features, while Clay includes 6 features. Evaluate which free tier matches your evaluation needs before deciding to upgrade. When upgrading to paid tiers, Agile CRM offers better value at approximately $416.01/mo difference for comparable tier levels. Plan accordingly if your team will graduate from the free tier within 12 months. Your best approach is to activate both free trials and evaluate which tool's workflow, integrations, and user experience align better with your team's needs before committing to paid plans.
Frequently Asked Questions: Agile CRM vs Clay
Which is cheaper, Agile CRM or Clay?
How many pricing plans does Agile CRM have vs Clay?
Does Agile CRM or Clay offer a free plan?
Can I save money by paying annually for Agile CRM or Clay?
What is the most popular Agile CRM plan?
What is the most popular Clay plan?
Does Agile CRM or Clay offer custom enterprise pricing?
Sources
- Agile CRM Official Pricing— Vendor pricing page
- Clay Official Pricing— Vendor pricing page
Related Articles
Enterprise vs Startup SaaS Pricing: Why 10–50x Cost Difference? (2026)
Why enterprise SaaS costs 10–50x more than startup alternatives. Pricing structure, TCO, support, customization, and compliance explained.
Best CRM Software Pricing Compared (2026)
Compare CRM pricing from HubSpot ($0-3,200/mo), Salesforce ($165-660/user/mo), and Pipedrive ($14/user/mo). Find the cheapest CRM for your team size.
Track Price Changes
Get notified when pricing changes for these tools.